Competitive
Competitive analysis template with a worked example
A reusable structure for comparing your product against rivals, shown with a real example — built to end in a strategic conclusion, not just a grid.
Here's a competitive analysis structure that ends where it should — in a strategic conclusion — shown with a worked example comparing a hypothetical project-management tool against two rivals.
Part 1: Dimension comparison
For each dimension, state where each player stands, then give a verdict for your product: ahead, parity, or exposed.
| Dimension | You | Rival A | Rival B | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positioning | For small agile teams | Enterprise suite | General task app | Differentiated |
| Pricing | $12/user | $25/user | Free + $8 | Exposed (B cheaper) |
| Integrations | 5 core | 40+ | 15 | Exposed |
| Trust / security | None yet | SOC 2, SSO | SOC 2 | Exposed |
| Onboarding | Minutes, self-serve | Sales-led, slow | Self-serve | Ahead vs A |
Part 2: Strategic read (the synthesis)
The table is the input; this is the deliverable.
- Their strengths: Rival A owns enterprise trust (SOC 2, SSO, deep integrations); Rival B owns price and a free tier.
- Their weaknesses: A is slow and expensive to adopt; B is generic and shallow for real teams.
- Your differentiation: fast, self-serve onboarding for small agile teams — a wedge neither rival serves well.
- Shared risks: a well-funded entrant could undercut everyone on price; all three depend on the same integration ecosystem.
- Where to compete: win on speed-to-value with small teams; don't fight A on enterprise integrations yet; close the trust gap (pursue SOC 2) before moving upmarket.
How to use it
- Be honest in the "exposed" rows — flattering yourself defeats the purpose.
- Re-run when the market moves: a competitor's price change or new feature can flip a verdict.
- Let the strategic read drive the roadmap, not the feature gaps in isolation.
Key takeaways
- Compare across positioning, audience, pricing, features, GTM, integrations, and trust.
- Add a verdict per dimension: are you ahead, at parity, or exposed?
- Finish with synthesis: their strengths/weaknesses, your moat, shared risks, where to compete.
- Keep it current — re-run it when the market moves, not once.
Try the Competitive Analysis workflow in Cadenly
Cadenly runs this template for you across multiple competitors — researching each dimension and producing the verdict and strategic read.
Start free →